About IEC 61508 (Functional Safety of E/E/PE Systems)
This event covers the compliance, engineering, and verification requirements defined by IEC 61508.
IEC 61508 is the foundational international standard for functional safety of electrical, electronic, and programmable electronic (E/E/PE) safety-related systems. It defines a complete safety lifecycle — from hazard and risk analysis through design, realization, operation, maintenance, and decommissioning — and is the parent standard from which sector standards such as ISO 26262 (automotive), IEC 61511 (process), and IEC 62061 (machinery) are derived.
What it regulates
Any E/E/PE system performing safety functions where failure could contribute to hazardous events, across all industry sectors unless a sector-specific derivative applies.
Who must comply
Manufacturers and integrators of safety instrumented systems, safety controllers, sensors and actuators used in safety functions; suppliers seeking SIL capability certification for components; and end users assembling safety functions from certified elements.
Frequently asked questions: IEC 61508
Does IEC 61508 certification apply to a whole machine?
No. IEC 61508 certifies safety-related systems and elements (controllers, sensors, software). Machinery-level conformity typically flows through ISO 13849 or IEC 62061 for the safety functions, and the EU Machinery Regulation for the machine as a whole.
When is IEC 61508 used directly instead of a sector standard?
When no sector derivative exists for the application (for example novel industrial equipment), when developing elements intended for use across sectors, or when a supplier wants a SIL-capable component usable under multiple derivative standards.
What is the difference between low-demand and high-demand mode?
Low-demand safety functions are called upon infrequently (less than once per year, measured by PFD), such as an emergency shutdown. High-demand or continuous functions operate frequently or constantly (measured by PFH), such as a machine guard interlock or a drive's safe torque off.
What is the difference between SIL 2 and SIL 3?
Each SIL step represents roughly an order of magnitude more risk reduction. SIL 3 imposes stricter targets for random hardware failure probability, tighter architectural constraints (higher HFT or SFF), and substantially more rigorous techniques against systematic faults in both hardware and software development.