AI & Functional Safety: Field Monitoring, Drift Detection and Safe Model Updates

Date
2027-03-10
Location
Online
Host
Zach L

About this event

A live 30-minute expert session on Field Monitoring, Drift Detection and Safe Model Updates (AI / ML — AI & Machine Learning Safety). What We'll Cover: Where operation-phase activities sit in the AI safety lifecycle and why ML degrades silently in the field Step by step: define field SPIs, instrument drift detectors, triage anomalies, gate retrained releases through regression and impact analysis How this maps to AI Act post-market monitoring and ISO/PAS 8800 operation clauses, producing the field monitoring plan and update records Common mistakes: OTA-updating model weights under a 'minor change' label with no safety re-assessment The SPI trend reports and update approval trail an auditor reviews for the in-service period Related topics: field monitoring ml · model drift · concept drift ·

Topics

Registration

View event page

About Functional Safety Foundations

This online session delivers expert-led instruction on the regulatory landscape and implementation approach for Functional Safety Foundations.

The cross-sector fundamentals underlying every functional safety standard: risk as severity × likelihood, the safety function concept, integrity levels, the safety lifecycle, and the split between random and systematic failures.

What it regulates

Shared vocabulary and reasoning: hazard → risk → risk reduction allocation → safety requirement → verified implementation → maintained integrity in operation.

Who must comply

Everyone entering the field — the conceptual base of the entire catalog.

Key requirements of Functional Safety Foundations

  • Hazard and risk fundamentals
  • Safety function anatomy: sensor-logic-actuator with defined safe state
  • Integrity ladders (SIL/PL/ASIL/DAL) as risk-reduction currencies
  • Random vs systematic failure treatment
  • Lifecycle and management of functional safety incl. competence

Key concepts: Functional Safety Foundations

Functional safety management
Planning, competence, documentation and assessment wrapped around technical work.
Safe state
The defined condition a function drives the equipment to on demand or fault.
Random vs systematic
Hardware wear-out/chance failures quantified statistically versus design/process errors controlled by rigor.
Risk reduction allocation
Distributing required risk reduction among mechanical design, safeguards, control functions and procedures.

Frequently asked questions: Functional Safety Foundations

Why can't testing alone prove safety?

Rare-event targets (like 1e-7/h) are unverifiable by test duration, and systematic errors evade random testing — hence the standards' dual machinery of quantified hardware analysis plus process rigor and independent assessment.

Standard information based on the published text of Functional Safety Foundations. Event content is provided by the host. For authoritative guidance, consult the official standard body.