About IEC 61508 (Functional Safety of E/E/PE Systems)
This hands-on workshop builds applied knowledge and team exercises around the certification requirements of IEC 61508.
IEC 61508 is the foundational international standard for functional safety of electrical, electronic, and programmable electronic (E/E/PE) safety-related systems. It defines a complete safety lifecycle — from hazard and risk analysis through design, realization, operation, maintenance, and decommissioning — and is the parent standard from which sector standards such as ISO 26262 (automotive), IEC 61511 (process), and IEC 62061 (machinery) are derived.
What it regulates
Any E/E/PE system performing safety functions where failure could contribute to hazardous events, across all industry sectors unless a sector-specific derivative applies.
Who must comply
Manufacturers and integrators of safety instrumented systems, safety controllers, sensors and actuators used in safety functions; suppliers seeking SIL capability certification for components; and end users assembling safety functions from certified elements.
Frequently asked questions: IEC 61508
Does IEC 61508 certification apply to a whole machine?
No. IEC 61508 certifies safety-related systems and elements (controllers, sensors, software). Machinery-level conformity typically flows through ISO 13849 or IEC 62061 for the safety functions, and the EU Machinery Regulation for the machine as a whole.
What is the difference between low-demand and high-demand mode?
Low-demand safety functions are called upon infrequently (less than once per year, measured by PFD), such as an emergency shutdown. High-demand or continuous functions operate frequently or constantly (measured by PFH), such as a machine guard interlock or a drive's safe torque off.
When is IEC 61508 used directly instead of a sector standard?
When no sector derivative exists for the application (for example novel industrial equipment), when developing elements intended for use across sectors, or when a supplier wants a SIL-capable component usable under multiple derivative standards.
What is the difference between SIL 2 and SIL 3?
Each SIL step represents roughly an order of magnitude more risk reduction. SIL 3 imposes stricter targets for random hardware failure probability, tighter architectural constraints (higher HFT or SFF), and substantially more rigorous techniques against systematic faults in both hardware and software development.