ISO 8800: Need for additional safety requirements on AI systems – Exercise
- Date
- 2028-08-05
- Location
- Online
- Host
- ISO/PAS 8800 (Functional Safety)
About this event
AI systems are moving into safety-relevant roles faster than many teams can fully evaluate the risks. This exercise is a practical space to work through a core question: when existing safety frameworks are not enough, what additional requirements does an AI-enabled system need? About the Event This online exercise is built for people who want to think clearly and concretely about AI safety requirements in the context of ISO 8800. Rather than treating safety as an abstract discussion, the session focuses on applying structured reasoning to systems that include AI, autonomy, and real-world operational complexity. The emphasis is on active participation. You should expect a working session, not a passive webinar. The goal is to examine where conventional safety approaches may fall short for A
Who should attend
This is for you if you want to think more rigorously about AI safety in practice, not just in theory. - You work on **AI-enabled or autonomous systems** and want to better understand when additional safety requirements may be necessary. - You are an **engineer, technical lead, architect, or product builder** who needs clearer ways to reason about safety when system behavior is shaped by models, data, or uncertainty. - You are involved in **risk, assurance, governance, compliance, or standards-related work** and want a more grounded discussion of how AI changes familiar safety assumptions. - You enjoy **exercise-based learning** and get more from working through a problem than from watching a presentation. - You want to hear how others in the community frame **acceptable risk, safeguards, and system boundaries** in AI contexts. - You are curious about **ISO 8800 and the broader safety conversation around AI**, whether you are building deep expertise or strengthening your current understanding. You do not need to show up with all the answers. The best fit is someone who is ready to participate, compare perspectives, and leave with sharper questions and more practical judgment.